(Omal expands on Kiri’s coercion dissertation by reminding that you have to be aware of the environment and that coercion can cause karmic paths to be changed in expanding circles. Also how, on higher dimensions, the ability to know past lives makes it cut and dried.) 

---

Omal: okay, now we have the rambunctious one out of the way, let us address Kiri's coercion. That is a mouthful is it not?

Russ: that is a mouthful.

Omal: okay, now Kiri talking about her responsibilities as a coercer, the calling of a feline. Yes it is a good example. The fact that it is a young, nervous feline is a good example of fine control and Kiri stating her awareness of the potential for harm is something that is important and necessary to be aware of in coercion. However, Kiri did skip over certain points that are necessary. When coercing, it is necessary to be aware of the person but also aware of your environment. Most coercion that is done is simple, thought out coercion. "I want you to do this, come here, go there, sit, stand." There is very little chance of harm coming in these situations. To take an analogy that Kiri has used a few times, you are at a rock concert and the person in front of you keeps on getting in your way. You coerce them to move to somewhere else or to sit down or if they are being vocal, coerce them to be quiet. There is nothing wrong in this, this is for your enjoyment and entertainment. It is not for self-gratification, there must be a line drawn there. It is something that you have wanted to attend, the rock concert, the play, the musical, whatever. The person in front of you is inconveniencing you and they are not being considerate. They are not thinking about other people around them. So to coerce them is quite acceptable because it is no longer a point of right or wrong but of consideration and morals. Is it morally correct to talk or to get in somebody's way that is at a place for their entertainment? You are there also to enjoy so by getting in their way, or somebody getting in your way, they are taking away from your enjoyment and they are not being aware of other people. So morally, it is quite acceptable to coerce somebody to move out of the way, to do something that is an inconvenience. However, it is quite easy to cross over into gray and black areas of coercion at this point that if you want somebody to move out of the way and go somewhere else and annoy somebody else, they will. So that you have changed their karmic path from annoying you to annoying somebody else that was not in the equation before. So it is better to coerce a person to sit down instead of going away so you have to be aware of how a small action can cause a bigger action. It is like the proverbial little chunk of snow down a slope. You drop the piece of snow and it starts to roll and it picks up momentum and more snow and so on until you have an avalanche on your hands and it is the same with coercion and the karmic pathway. You can use coercion to change somebody's karmic path for a possible better outcome. There are other uses of coercion. Any questions at this point?

Russ: yeah, it's much simpler in sixth dimension to determine the uses of coercion than in the third I assume?

Omal: yes, it is.

Russ: okay.

Omal: oh, okay.

Russ: well I mean it's just......I know it's self-evident but but it's just you're able to look at past lives......

Omal: okay, yes it is self-evident. It is better than saying, "yes" and raising my hands as if I'm looking for an extra answer or an extra question. Let me explain more detail. As you stated, yes past lives are in play, you are aware of your past lives and your past life interaction with the individual. Also, as Tia is fond of talking about, morals, that the moral understanding is more aware instead of black and white, this is wrong, that is wrong, maybe that's right, maybe that's wrong. With the moral equation added in to the coercion and the past life experience added in, then coercion is very cut and dry on, is it appropriate? No. Is it appropriate in this situation? Yes and you know why. For example, Kiri coercing the feline, and we end up back there. The feline was sitting outside in a cool environment. It wanted attention and warmth. By Kiri pulling it into the room it starts to overcome the fear of people and other interactions. Now if Kiri had been very clever about it, she would've had the feline come close but stay out of arm reach and be warm. Sit in a blanket, sit in a place where it can watch and be comfortable. To be able to go through the thought processes necessary for that feline to overcome its fear of people instead of it not comprehending why the compulsion was for it to come into the room. In Kiri's case it was a demonstration of coercion, plain and simple on how coercion works and interacts. The moral issue was not addressed, even though I'm sure that Kiri considered the morals. The karmic issue was not addressed because there is no karmic issue to look at between Kiri and the feline. The feline was there just pure and simply by chance as a tool. But taking the moral issue, Kiri did the right thing, not the way that I would've done it but it was addressed. Any questions at this time?

Russ: yeah, as we get more in tune with our consciousness and our superego, that will enter more into play and we'll then have a greater step towards that understanding I assume?

Omal: correct and the reason being that with the vibrational changes, the necessary interaction of the subconscious and superego comes into play and no longer becomes subconscious. It becomes back to the computer analogies, sub routines necessary for survival.

Russ: excellent good, thank you, that ties it all together nicely.

Omal: thank you.