| 
              
                 (Omal takes us back
                      to the 50s when society’s morals were quite a bit
                      different than can be found now. His premise is
                      that the breakdown of morals leads to less of an
                      incentive to pursue spiritual growth. He uses an
                      example of a couple on the base as a learning aid
                      as to how it would be if we were ascended.)
 
 
 Omal:
                      greetings and felicitations Russ.
 
 Russ: greetings Omal.
 
 Omal: she does work hard on her dissertation does
                      she not?
 
 Russ: yes she does.
 
 Omal: she does put a lot of passion into it.
 
 Russ: very informative.
 
 Omal: yes, she does work hard. Okay, let’s look at
                      Tia's first analysis of the stock market. She is
                      correct in every detail as always, accuracy seems
                      to be her middle name. I would like to expand upon
                      her explanation of the interference of
                      governmental agencies. When she talks of a
                      government fresh and interfering in a behavioral
                      pattern of a stock market, it works like a brake
                      being applied. When this brake is applied, things
                      slow down, growth slows down, confidence slows
                      down but when a government is hogtied with other
                      matters, all those breaks have been removed. It is
                      like a vehicle going downhill, when you have your
                      foot on the brake you control it, you control the
                      speed. When you take your foot off the brake, it
                      accelerates out of control and out of speed. This
                      occurs when situations conspire against
                      individuals. At the moment it is the brightest
                      part before the storm. Things are looking good.
                      The next year to a year and a half will tell what
                      is going to transpire. Okay let us look at Tia's
                      last comments on moral behaviors. Tia as we know
                      is a very moral individual, she holds her morals
                      up high. She has learned to be respecting of other
                      people’s opinions but to hold fast to her morals
                      of the family, behavior in public, language. Tia
                      may use Durondedunn phrases to swear but having
                      had to study a little bit of the language, her
                      phrases that she uses, the descriptive one of
                      fraugh is polite in actual fact. From what I have
                      learned, it means, "may you enjoy the flavor of my
                      after food as you munch on my underwear". That is
                      a correct translation, basically eat my shorts. So
                      Tia’s behavior is obviously stated in her views on
                      the morals and her views are very correct, they
                      are a sixth dimensional and a third dimensional
                      blending of moral opinions. And by having these
                      morals and trying to live by them is a good
                      indicator on how people should behave. She has
                      learned extremely well that the third dimensional
                      way has certain advantages and the sixth
                      dimensional way has certain advantages. Being of a
                      third dimensional ancestry, she has to deal with
                      those third dimensional mindset and thinking.
                      Living in a sixth dimensional workspace
                      environment, she has come to terms in being able
                      to refine her moral outlook on life which is a
                      good moral outlook on life. Tia does not lie, she
                      does not cheat, she does not bend the truth unless
                      it is necessary to protect. She has learned that
                      protecting friends, family, and associates is very
                      important, before it was just family. How does
                      that affect a third dimensional society such as
                      yours? Well having a high moral standard seems to
                      be able to focus somebody in a direct path that is
                      beneficial for enlightenment. If for example
                      taking the incident of Kelly Flynn, morals would
                      have dictated that first of all the first thing
                      that she did wrong was adultery, she destroyed a
                      marriage. What benefit did she get from destroying
                      a marriage? Well, she has been rewarded by people
                      asking for her to do book contracts. Is it correct
                      to idolize somebody that has committed adultery
                      and destroyed a marriage? I will let you decide
                      that. Secondly lying, not once but many times, is
                      that correct? Again I will let you decide.
                      Disobeying an order in an environment where orders
                      are important to be followed, again is this
                      correct? Regardless of the order, it is important
                      that the order be carried out as best as possible,
                      is that correct? I will again let you decide on
                      that. The development of a society depends on its
                      moral behavior. Tia is quite astute at perceiving
                      moral behavior and how it affects a growth or a
                      stunting in growth of a society. It is fine to be
                      tolerant and understanding but it is important
                      also to stick to one's moral opinion, to stick to
                      a moral pathway and not to deviate from that. It
                      is good to be open and to be able to look at
                      everything and to be able to come to a wise
                      conclusion but, if you have certain principles
                      that aid you in this, that give you the confidence
                      necessary to be a successful developed individual
                      in a spiritual and physical capacity, will lead
                      you to a higher enlightenment than just being a
                      person that goes, "I understand your point of
                      view, let me think on this, you may be right".
                      "Lying may be a good thing, let me think about
                      this". "Cheating on one’s husband or wife is a
                      good thing". These things obviously are not good
                      and by falling into that trap, society is affected
                      in a way that the level of behavior becomes lower.
                      When that occurs and people that expect lower
                      standards from other individuals, then again that
                      lowers itself again. When it becomes common to use
                      foul language in everyday conversation, then an
                      individual and a society if it becomes very
                      prevalent is in problems, serious problems. This
                      is one of the signs to look out for as things get
                      worse, when it becomes acceptable to use foul
                      language as part of a normal conversation. Where
                      it becomes acceptable to use F words and B words
                      and C words when talking to somebody and it is not
                      even an eye-raising experience. Okay, let us
                      answer your questions.
 
 Russ: okay first off, on the issues on the stock
                      market. Now the point where the government
                      interferes, I noticed that our most current
                      example of where the government interferes is
                      where the federal exchange Chairman, I believe his
                      name is………
 
 Omal: Greenspan.
 
 Russ: Greenspan, he set the interest rates at a
                      higher rate than they had been before. At that
                      point though is the point where we saw the stock
                      market rise ever since then and it’s been on an
                      upswing since so at this point I’m wondering is
                      that perhaps an accident or did he actually do
                      some good there?
 
 Omal: he intended it to go up. The reason why he
                      intended it to go up is that people will look at
                      the stock market and they see this action, the
                      stock market climbing higher and higher and they
                      feel good about that. People are making money,
                      people are doing well, it gives a false sense of
                      confidence. As Tia pointed out, with a growth rate
                      of only 1.2%, there is something wrong when that
                      is looked upon as great when in a normal booming
                      society, let us take the economy of Kennedy where
                      it was 5.2% through most of his living
                      administration, it was booming. What is the
                      difference there?
 
 Russ: well the Kennedy administration came on
                      right at 1960 and at that point people looked
                      toward a new decade as opposed to the old decade
                      of the 50s known as the silent generation,
                      suddenly it was......and you can see it in much of
                      the culture.......a bright spot happening and I
                      feel that kind of caught on at a nationwide level.
 
 Omal: but why didn’t it occur this time?
 
 Russ: well, you right mean now?
 
 Omal: uh-huh.
 
 Russ: well it’s not the 60s, the 60s were a time
                      of dreaming and hopes.
 
 Omal: but not to start off with, there were a lot
                      of dark situations. The Bay of Pigs, the Cuban
                      missile crisis, the start of the Vietnam War, far
                      worse than what is happening now.
 
 Russ: true but we're talking Kennedy and the
                      Vietnam war was post Kennedy.
 
 Omal: it started in ‘64.
 
 Russ: right, Kennedy was killed in 60…..
 
 Omal: four.
 
 Russ: four.
 
 (Ed note: it was actually November 22nd, 1963)
 
 Omal: Kennedy sent advisers into North
                            Vietnam.......or South
                      Vietnam rather in ‘63.
 
 Russ: uh-huh.
 
 Omal: the war started then, it did not escalate to
                      the size until later but it started then. It did
                      not tear the country apart until later.
 
 Russ: I think some of it actually might have to do
                      with music.
 
 Omal: that came later.
 
 Russ: well that’s true but just if you look at the
                      music of the 50s, even up to 59, and you look at
                      the music one year later, there are some very
                      marked changes there that I think had a bit to do
                      with it.
 
 Omal: no.
 
 Russ: no?
 
 Omal: they were the result of what was going on.
 
 Russ: hmm.
 
 Omal: people were feeling good, people were
                      feeling great, life was wonderful.
 
 Russ: well wasn’t this also the time the baby
                      boomers were starting to come along?
 
 Omal: the baby boomers….
 
 Russ: World War II?
 
 Omal: correct.
 
 Russ: and they were reaching their point of
                      maturing.
 
 Omal: no, they were coming into the workplace.....
 
 Russ: right.
 
 Omal: but they were not reaching maturity.
                      Maturity comes later in life Russ.
 
 Russ: okay.
 
 Omal: okay, now the difference between then and
                      now is the moral outlook. They still had very high
                      moral standards. Somebody caught in an adulterous
                      affair was shunned and ostracized. Now, how many
                      people do you know that have had adulterous
                      affairs?
 
 Russ: quite a few.
 
 Omal: but back then it was almost unheard of. It
                      was either swept under the table and kept very
                      quiet or the person was ostracized and the court
                      case was nasty and bloody. As you said, they would
                      lose their children, they would lose a larger
                      percentage of their property than they would have
                      normally. Now, it’s no big deal. In fact as Tia
                      pointed out, sometimes it is used as a tool.
 
 Russ: well the 60s did bring along that change
                      though with the Summer of Love, free love…..
 
 Omal: uh-uh, that's too far, we’re talking about
                      the Kennedy administration.
 
 Russ: oh okay.
 
 Omal: not the Johnson administration. We are
                      talking between the difference between the Kennedy
                      administration and now and it is all one thing,
                      the morals.
 
 Russ: hmm.
 
 Omal: a frequent topic of conversation is the
                      president’s moral compass.
 
 Russ: Kennedy had some very low morals though in
                      that respect.
 
 Omal: uh-huh.
 
 Russ: his adulterous affairs, you could write
                      major books of and some have been written.
 
 Omal: yes, they’re all written after his
                      death.....
 
 Russ: after his death.
 
 Omal: when they came to light, after he had been
                      assassinated. The current ones are coming to light
                      during the administration and it is not just one
                      or two or even three individuals, Kennedy is made
                      to look like a wimp compared to this individual.
 
 Russ: but don’t we see the beginnings of this
                      then?
 
 Omal: yes you do, you do. The moral standards were
                      already lowered after the administration
                      of....what’s his name? Ike, Eisenhower.
 
 Russ: right.
 
 Omal: it would’ve been better if Nixon had been
                      elected.
 
 Russ: it would’ve kept the moral standards
                      higher……
 
 Omal: and therefore the chance of what transpired
                      would’ve been lessened.
 
 Russ: but then again we see a lot of good things
                      that came about because of Kennedy too.
 
 Omal: correct.
 
 Russ: the space program…..
 
 Omal: correct.
 
 Russ: much of the welfare system.
 
 Omal: that goes back further actually.
 
 Russ: oh it does?
 
 Omal: yes, it goes back to FDR.
 
 Russ: I knew it had something to do with something
                      like that.
 
 Omal: yes he did, Bill of Rights.
 
 Russ: yeah, Bill of Rights.
 
 Omal: which is a great and wonderful thing. I am
                      not condemning Kennedy or any president including
                      this current one, I’m saying that it is a symptom
                      of a society that has become too opulent.
 
 Russ: now what have those changes in the moral
                      systems have to do with the consciousness of the
                      country?
 
 Omal: okay, where a moral behavioral pattern is
                      set in place…..for example, let us get back to
                      adultery. Where adultery becomes common, that sets
                      up a karmic distraction that has to be worked out.
                      When you are dealing with something of a situation
                      such as that, how can you think clearly on
                      spiritual matters?
 
 Russ: uh-hmm.
 
 Omal: you see the problem?
 
 Russ: right.
 
 Omal: let us say you are concerned with the
                      well-being of children?
 
 Russ: uh-huh.
 
 Omal: you are concerned with getting as much as
                      possible for the children in the ensuing
                      separation so therefore you do not deal with the
                      spiritual matters that you should be, you do not
                      have time to sit down and deal with the spiritual
                      growth that you would normally go through. When a
                      situation occurs like that, you are more
                      preoccupied, you cannot think clearly. That half
                      an hour or an hour that you have set aside to sit
                      down and meditate, you're going to be thinking of
                      other matters. So therefore by a degradation in
                      moral structure leads to spiritual flatness where
                      it becomes flat, you are preoccupied with other
                      matters. Not of the development of yourself, your
                      spouse or your offspring.
 
 Russ: hmm, okay.
 
 Omal: but, there are exceptions to the rule.
 
 Russ: right.
 
 Omal: next question.
 
 Russ: not to set any standards or to point any
                      fingers or anything, but personally looking at
                      Hades Base, it seems as though it’s more of a 60s
                      in their moral standards than there is more of the
                      50s.
 
 Omal: yes but there is the moral standings of,
                      from what I have gathered, all the sexual antics
                      that go on, all people involved are aware of what
                      is going on. For example, let us take a secretary
                      that I have. She is in the early stages of
                      pregnancy. Her bond mate is very, very excited
                      about the upcoming child. Her boyfriend is also
                      ecstatic. It is her boyfriend’s first child. The
                      fact that all three individuals knew what was
                      going on makes the situation much easier. The fact
                      that the partner or the bond mate was very
                      consensual and said, "enjoy and I hope this works"
                      is something that is understood. So, all three
                      people agreed on what was happening. The reason
                      they agreed is the young gentleman, the father,
                      has some good genes. The mother has some great
                      genes. The bond mate, being in the medical
                      department, was aware of the potential for the
                      offspring and development. The agreement is that
                      all three people involved will be the parents
                      although the bond mate will be the primary male
                      parent. The other individual, the father of the
                      offspring, will be in a behavioral pattern of an
                      uncle even though the child is his. So therefore
                      by being of an intelligence level, they understand
                      that their actions and behavior has to be in such
                      a way that all benefit. You see what I’m saying?
 
 Russ: of course, because I’m in the same situation
                      of course.
 
 (Karra and Alana are both my bond mates)
 
 Omal: correct.
 
 Russ: okay, I think you said it best in your
                      dissertation when you mentioned the openness and
                      if the relationship does not affect...how did you
                      put it? The physical and spiritual well-being of
                      the people involved….
 
 Omal: uh-huh.
 
 Russ: which I believe we are seeing on Hades Base
                      is, these sexual antics as you call them….
 
 Omal: uh-huh.
 
 Russ: do not affect the physical or spiritual
                      well-being of the individuals.
 
 Omal: in fact in this situation it enhances.
 
 Russ: correct, correct. And I’m sure, just from my
                      viewing of all this, I bet it is true in all these
                      things that go on….
 
 Omal: correct.
 
 Russ: but I’m just saying from and outsider’s
                      point of view looking in on this would see a 60s
                      bacchanalia.
 
 Omal: uh-huh.
 
 Russ: and somebody with a more Puritan…..
 
 Omal: attitude.
 
 Russ: attitude, would turn their nose up and quite
                      literally frown heartily at this.
 
 Omal: that is correct they would, but to
                      understand a society and to see the problems, you
                      have to have all the information and facts. An
                      individual that looks at something, turns up their
                      nose, says how horrible and degradated it is
                      without experiencing or receiving information on
                      that society is making a big mistake. We have the
                      information necessary to come to a formulated
                      answer on the situation on the morals in your
                      planet.
 
 Russ: uh-huh.
 
 Omal: an individual looking from the outside in on
                      our little group would have very little
                      information from that.
 
 Russ: right.
 
 Omal: and bacchanalia is a word I have not heard
                      in a long time......
 
 (Russ starts to chuckle)
 
 Omal: well not that long. Sometimes it seems like
                      a few moments and sometimes it seems like maybe a
                      few weeks.
 
 Russ: well that’s why I'm looking forward to
                      possibly enlightening people over the fact that
                      there is a alternative towards the moral
                      degradation as being a more uplifting experience.
 
 Omal: it is a spiritual level of awareness that
                      you have to achieve first. With that should come
                      the morals to be intelligent enough to understand
                      the actions.
 
 Russ: uh-huh, correct. So you need to look at it
                      from that viewpoint….
 
 Omal: yes.
 
 Russ: as opposed to one more close minded.
 
 Omal: correct. You first of all have to become
                      spiritually aware enough to understand that
                      sometimes things happen not for the better of an
                      individual but for the better of the group.
 
 
 
 |